Comparison+&+contrast

Assignment
Click the following link and you will find a text called "Mandelbrot and Julia Sets". Please read it carefully and locate comparisons and contrasts among the fractals described there. Explain what made you notice that there were comparisons and or contrasts in the text. As soon as you have your assignment ready please write your answers in your wiki. []

= = = = =Comparisons = Contrasts = = =Mandelbrot and Julia Sets=

Both Mandelbrot and Julia sets are types of fractals. However, these are more complicated fractals then the other fractals that have been mentioned (such as the [|Sierpinski's triangle]). Both these sets require the use of **complex numbers**. Thus before one can understand how the sets are created one needs to know some very simple properties of complex numbers. If you know the basics of complex numbers you may skip the section on them and continue reading. However, for those who are unfamiliar with complex numbers, there is a brief explanation that can be read by [|clicking here]. To compute the basic Mandelbrot (or Julia) set one uses the equation f(z) -- > z 2 + c, where both z and c are complex numbers. To describe what occurs it is easier to view the function f(z) to be a machine that squares a complex number and then adds c to it. Now to compute the sets one takes a starting value for z and places it in the "machine". The number is squared and c is added to it and a new number (most likely) comes out of our machine. Now, one places that new number in the machine and the process occurs again. This process is called iteration and it is how the Mandelbrot and Julia sets are computed. The purpose of the iteration is to determine the behaviour of the values that are put into the function, as will be shown in the following example. For the simplicity of the example we will use real numbers, but it should be noted that one could also use complex numbers to illustrate the point. f ( ½ ) = ¼ f ( ¼ ) = 1/16 f (1/16) = 1/256
 * Example 1:** f(z) -- > z 2 + c where the starting value for z is between 0 and 1 and c is 0.

It is obvious that if the iteration is continued the value will go towards 0. It is equally obvious that if one were to take a number greater than 1, after iterating it repeatedly, the value will go to infinity. For the Mandelbrot and Julia sets it can be proved (through a very complex proof) that if the distance, on the Cartesian plane (remember we are using complex numbers here), between the origin and a point resulting from the iteration of some initial value is greater than 2 then the behaviour of that initial value is that it will go to infinity. If, however, after numerous iterations (possibly hundreds, thousands or more) the distance between that origin and the point is never greater than two, it is said that this point is bounded. Then, knowing that, the definition of the Mandelbrot set is : the set of all the complex numbers, c, such that the iteration of **f(z) -- > z 2 + c** is bounded (starting with z =0 + 0//i//). More simply put, the Mandelbrot set is the graph of all the complex numbers c, that do not go to infinity when iterated in **f(z) -- > z 2 + c**, with a starting value of z =0 + 0//i.// A Julia set is almost the same thing. It is defined to be : the set of all the complex numbers, z, such that the iteration of **f(z) -- > z 2 + c** is bounded for a particular value of c. Again, more simply put it is the graph of all the complex numbers z, that do not go to infinity when iterated in **f(z) -- > z 2 + c**, where c is constant. It should be understood that these are simply the basic definitions of the two sets. The function that is iterated can be practically anything, as long as it uses complex numbers. Thus the basic difference between the Mandelbrot set and Julia set is that in any Mandelbrot set, you are plotting various values of c on a Cartesian plane, whereas for a Julia set, you are plotting various starting values of z, and c is kept constant. If you wish to see more examples of Mandelbrot and Julia Sets, please check out the [|fractal gallery].

For further information please visit: []

I think that makes me believe or notice that there were comparisons and or contrasts in the text is :

- In the first case ( Comparisons ), both features's are put together , through a comparative link - In the second case ( contrasts ), both diffferences's are detaileds carefully with links as , but, however ...